In recent years, the word “narcissist” has become part of everyday language. It appears in relationship conversations, social media posts, podcasts, and advice columns. For many women, the term has offered something powerful: language for pain that once felt confusing or silenced.
Registered Counsellor, Melissa Davids asserts that naming harm matters, and so does validation. "But when a psychological diagnosis becomes a cultural shorthand, we run the risk of unintentionally creating division, misunderstanding, and misrepresentation of a serious mental health condition," she cautions. Here, she sheds some light...
When language shifts from clinical to casual
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a recognised mental health diagnosis that requires careful assessment by trained professionals. It describes a pervasive pattern of behaviour, not a single argument, emotional shutdown, or relational failure.
Yet today, the word is often used to describe:
- Emotional unavailability
- Poor communication
- Defensiveness
- Self-focus during stress
- Conflict dynamics in relationships
These behaviours can be hurtful. They can damage trust. They can even end relationships. But they are not, on their own, narcissism.
When we use clinical language casually, we blur the line between harmful behaviour and mental illness, and that distinction matters.
Why women resonate so strongly with the term
Many women were socialised to minimise their emotional needs, over-function in relationships, and explain away red flags. Discovering language that validates their experiences can feel liberating. For some, naming narcissism finally gives shape to years of confusion or self-doubt.
That validation is real ,and deserved.
However, validation becomes problematic when it replaces nuance or turns into a universal explanation for relational pain. When every emotionally unsafe experience is framed as narcissistic abuse, we lose the ability to distinguish between:
- Malice and immaturity
- Abuse and emotional skill deficits
- Personality disorder and unhealed wounds
The unintended cost of over-labelling
Overuse of the term doesn’t just misrepresent a diagnosis — it can deepen divides.
It can:
- Shut down dialogue instead of encouraging growth
- Turn complex human dynamics into “villain vs victim” stories
- Make accountability feel like attack
- Discourage men from engaging in emotional work or therapy
- And silence conversations about how women, too, can act in emotionally harmful ways
This is not about protecting egos. It’s about protecting truth and healing.
Emotional harm deserves accountability — without misdiagnosis
Someone can hurt you deeply and still not be a narcissist.Someone can lack empathy and still be capable of growth.Someone can fail you emotionally without having a personality disorder.
We do not need extreme labels to honour real pain.
In fact, healing is often more possible when we focus on specific behaviours rather than sweeping diagnoses:
- “This relationship felt emotionally unsafe.”
- “My needs were consistently dismissed.”
- “There was a pattern of control, avoidance, or manipulation.”
These statements hold truth without misusing clinical language.
Moving toward responsibility instead of reduction
Mental health language should expand understanding, not reduce people to labels. When we oversimplify, we risk recreating the very harm we are trying to name: emotional invalidation, silencing, and polarisation.
Being careful with our words does not mean minimising women’s experiences. It means trusting that our pain is valid even without extreme terminology.
Because real empowerment is not about labelling others, it’s about clarity, boundaries, and healing rooted in truth.
Recent stories by:
Thobeka Phanyeko
Book Review: Go Love Yourself by Zachary Levi
This is how you can tap into the power of manifestation to help you achieve your goals
Are you codependent? This is what you need to know
Houses we loved on BBC Lifestyle's Listing Coastal South Africa
